<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FrankDzedzy.com &#187; IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frankdzedzy.com/category/it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frankdzedzy.com</link>
	<description>A blog about IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:12:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hard Drive Failure</title>
		<link>http://frankdzedzy.com/2009/03/05/hard-drive-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://frankdzedzy.com/2009/03/05/hard-drive-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdzedzy.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upon arriving at work yesterday morning, I was greeted by a blue screen with a KERNEL_STACK_INPAGE_ERROR message and a STOP: 0X00000077 code.  As I rebooted the box, I received an UNMOUNTABLE_BOOT_VOLUME with STOP: 0XC0000185.  Some quick research on another computer showed that these codes were indicative of a bad hard drive.   And Dell Diagnostics returned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon arriving at work yesterday morning, I was greeted by a blue screen with a KERNEL_STACK_INPAGE_ERROR message and a STOP: 0X00000077 code.  As I rebooted the box, I received an UNMOUNTABLE_BOOT_VOLUME with STOP: 0XC0000185.  Some quick research on another computer showed that these codes were indicative of a bad hard drive.   And Dell Diagnostics returned error code 0142 with status byte 78 when it checked the hard drive.  I called Dell with error and I should have my replacement hard drive today.  Ironically the previous day, I cleaned up my box, placing all my essential files onto my share on the san.  There were a few older backups and software installations that I didn&#8217;t save, but I can always redownload the software.  It has been very annoying and counter productive the last two days to use an older underpowered workstation that I found under a desk.  It is frustrating not to have all the tools I normally use frequently not installed.  This situation has made me think harder about experimenting with VDI.  Having a virtual desktop stored on our san would be very helpful.  I could install the tools I typically use and set it up just the way I want to without have to worry about hardware failure.  This has been the first drive fail on a workstation I have used that was no longer usable at all.  I attempted to read the drive with a Knoppix cd and was unsuccessful.  Makes me wish I could have RAID on my workstation similar to the servers I manage.  That way I could avoid having to resetup my work environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankdzedzy.com/2009/03/05/hard-drive-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Symantec bug</title>
		<link>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/11/11/another-symantec-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/11/11/another-symantec-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdzedzy.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I found a fix to a problem I have been having with my Symantec antivirus server.Â  For a while now, every time I tried to unlock the server group in System Center I received this message:Â  &#8220;Error: Can&#8217;t communicate with the Server Goup. Verify Network Connectivity and that machines are operating within the Group! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I found a fix to a problem I have been having with my Symantec antivirus server.Â  For a while now, every time I tried to unlock the server group in System Center I received this message:Â  &#8220;Error: Can&#8217;t communicate with the Server Goup. Verify Network Connectivity and that machines are operating within the Group! If problem persists, try clearing the Server Group cache and re-discovering all Server Groups.&#8221; after a brief timeout.Â  I ignored it for a while since I didn&#8217;t really need to do anything to the group and the server was running fine otherwise.Â  But yesterday I found this <a href="http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1116899&amp;page=7">forum thread</a> and <a href="http://service1.symantec.com/support/ent-security.nsf/docid/2005082415100448?Open&amp;src=w">this article</a> from Symantec describing a fix to the problem.Â  Apparently there is a registry DWORD value at &#8220;HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Intel\LanDesk\VirusProtect6\CurrentVersion\ScSComms\LocalData&#8221; called &#8220;LoginCaCertIssueSerialNum&#8221;.Â  This is a counter that increments each time the group is unlocked.Â  Once the value exceeds 256, the group becomes unable to be unlocked.Â  Setting the value back to 1 fixed the problem immediatly for me.Â  I found this right after I had opened a case with Symantec, and a tech called me right after I fixed the problem on my own.Â  Of course he had the same solution, but I asked him why this is set up like this and he had no answer.Â  According to Symantec&#8217;s article this is fixed in version 10.0.2, and my server is just behind that.Â  It needs to be upgraded anyway.Â  I have seen so many strange bugs in Symantec software, but they aren&#8217;t <a href="http://securityandthe.net/2008/11/10/avg-virus-scanner-removes-critical-windows-file/">the only ones</a> with issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/11/11/another-symantec-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Missing Network</title>
		<link>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/07/07/the-missing-network/</link>
		<comments>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/07/07/the-missing-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdzedzy.com/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had to make a small change to the network of a QA box I manage.Â  So I logged in, via remote desktop using a domain admin account and went to the open the network connection.Â  Which was missing.Â  An ipconfig confirmed that I did haveÂ a network address, and of course it was working since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to make a small change to the network of a QA box I manage.Â  So I logged in, via remote desktop using a domain admin account and went to the open the network connection.Â  Which was missing.Â  An ipconfig confirmed that I did haveÂ a network address, and of course it was working since I was accessing the machine remotely.Â  Very puzzling.Â  A reboot did not solve the problem either.Â  Since it is working, I&#8217;m not gonna mess with it.Â  I took this screenshot to document the problem.</p>
<p><span id="more-68"></span></p>
<p><img src="/images/weirdnetwork2.png" alt="" width="732" height="680" /></p>
<p>Anyone ever come across something like this?Â  It is a Windows 2003 box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/07/07/the-missing-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Endpoint Issues</title>
		<link>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/06/11/more-endpoint-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/06/11/more-endpoint-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdzedzy.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After my previous observation of Endpoint&#8217;s memory usage, I came across a disk space issue.Â  On both test Windows 2003 clients, I found that the space on C: was completely gone.Â  Using some space analysis tools I found that on both servers, c:\program files\common files\Symantec shared\virusdefs contained several gigs of temp files.Â  Some research on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After my previous observation of <a href="http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/05/30/symantec-endpoint-is-a-memory-pig/">Endpoint&#8217;s memory usage</a>, I came across a disk space issue.Â  On both test Windows 2003 clients, I found that the space on C: was completely gone.Â  Using some space analysis tools I found that on both servers, c:\program files\common files\Symantec shared\virusdefs contained several gigs of temp files.Â  Some research on Symantec&#8217;s forum&#8217;s showed me that this was a <a href="https://forums.symantec.com/syment/board/message?board.id=endpoint_protection11&amp;message.id=7270">common problem</a>.Â  I also found on <a href="http://www.kavinda.net/2008/05/07/VanishingHardDiskSpace.aspx">this blog</a> that this should be fixed in MR2.Â  I have not checked my version number, but I am assuming that I don&#8217;t have MR2 installed.Â  I haven&#8217;t yet had a chance to install and test, but have instead removed Endpoint from one of the test servers, and my own desktop where I was testing.Â  Performance on my machine instantly improved.Â  My machine is a brand new Dell, with dual core and 2gb of ram.Â  If it can slow that down so drastically, I am definitly not going to drag older machine&#8217;s down with Endpoint.Â  Hopefully MR2 improves these <a href="http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/docid_p/2007121216360648">problems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/06/11/more-endpoint-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Symantec Endpoint is a Memory Pig</title>
		<link>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/05/30/symantec-endpoint-is-a-memory-pig/</link>
		<comments>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/05/30/symantec-endpoint-is-a-memory-pig/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdzedzy.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past week I have been playing with Symantec Endpoint in preparation for a migration from Symantec Client Security 10.Â  Endpoint is basically the next version of Symantec&#8217;s anti-virus with a firewall and antispyware combined.Â  The management server seemed to have way more features than the previous version, however the interface is not any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past week I have been playing with Symantec Endpoint in preparation for a migration from Symantec Client Security 10.Â  Endpoint is basically the next version of Symantec&#8217;s anti-virus with a firewall and antispyware combined.Â  The management server seemed to have way more features than the previous version, however the interface is not any more intuitive than before.Â  Now, I&#8217;ve always noticed that symantec&#8217;s products are huge resource hogs, so I was surprised to notice that the size of rtvscan.exe had only a fraction of the mem usage of previous versions.Â  However on further investigation on several test machines I found that the usage was actually rediculously higher.Â  I&#8217;ve compiled a chart showing the differences in the usage.Â  I had four test machines running on VMware virtual machines.Â  Two windows xp clients, and two windows 2003 servers, one as a client, and the other as a management server.Â  Both Endpoint, and Client Security 10 memory usage is shown.</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="213" valign="top">XP SP3</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">No client</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">110 mb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="213" valign="top">XP SP3</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">Client Security 10</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">190 mb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="213" valign="top">XP SP3</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">Endpoint</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">283 mb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="213" valign="top">Win2003</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">No client</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">90 mb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="213" valign="top">Win2003</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">Client Security 10</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">266 mb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="213" valign="top">Win2003</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">Endpoint Client</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">285 mb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="213" valign="top">Win2003</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">SymantecÂ  10 Server</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">555 mb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="213" valign="top">Win2003</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">Endpoint Server</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">1037 mb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="213" valign="top">Win2003</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">Endpoint Server w/ Management program open</td>
<td width="213" valign="top">1403 mb</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>All the test machines has a fully updated system with nothing running but the Symantec program, wiht the exception of the Symantec 10 server which was also running several smaller inhouse apps.Â  The management program uses java, (another pig) which explains the high use of memory when the management app is open.Â  I attempted to do PCmark benchmarks, however it didnt like the virtual machines.</p>
<p>This is an horrible misuse of memory.Â  The program&#8217;s size on disk is less than all that.Â  Several posts by developers on symantec&#8217;s forums mentioned that they tried to reduce the memory footprint.Â  Not sure how they thought they were doing that.Â  I am hesitant to start rolling this out, because I know that all my users will start complaining about their machines slowing down.Â  I am running the endpoint client on my machine, however its a brand new Dell and has plenty of resources to spare.Â  I just need to install it on a Vista machine for the ultimate bloat experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankdzedzy.com/2008/05/30/symantec-endpoint-is-a-memory-pig/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things You Don&#8217;t Want to Hear Your SysAdmin say</title>
		<link>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/08/things-you-dont-want-to-hear-your-sysadmin-say/</link>
		<comments>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/08/things-you-dont-want-to-hear-your-sysadmin-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humorous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/08/things-you-dont-want-to-hear-your-sysadmin-say/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This list of 100 things you don&#8217;t want to here your System Administrator say comes from PacketStorm Unix Humor.  And I&#8217;ve got to admit, I&#8217;ve said several of these lines before.
1. Uh-ohâ€¦..
2. Shit!!
3. What the hell!?
4. Go get your backup tape. (You do have a backup tape?)
5. Thatâ€™s SOOOOO bizarre.
6. Wow!! Look at thisâ€¦..
7. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list of 100 things you don&#8217;t want to here your System Administrator say comes from <a href="http://packetstorm.linuxsecurity.com/unix-humor/">PacketStorm Unix Humor</a>.  And I&#8217;ve got to admit, I&#8217;ve said several of these lines before.<br />
1. Uh-ohâ€¦..<br />
2. Shit!!<br />
3. What the hell!?<br />
4. Go get your backup tape. (You do have a backup tape?)<br />
5. Thatâ€™s SOOOOO bizarre.<br />
6. Wow!! Look at thisâ€¦..<br />
7. Hey!! The suns donâ€™t do this.<br />
8. Terminated??!<br />
9. What software license?<br />
10. Well, itâ€™s doing somethingâ€¦..</p>
<p><span id="more-55"></span><br />
11. Wowâ€¦.that seemed fastâ€¦..<br />
12. I got a better job at Lockheedâ€¦<br />
13. Management saysâ€¦<br />
14. Sorry, the new equipment didnâ€™t get budgetted.<br />
15. What do you mean that wasnâ€™t a copy?<br />
16. It didnâ€™t do that a minute agoâ€¦<br />
17. Whereâ€™s the GUI on this thing?<br />
18. Damn, and I just bought that popâ€¦<br />
19. Whereâ€™s the DIR command?<br />
20. The drive ate the tape but thatâ€™s OK, I brought my screwdriver.<br />
21. I cleaned up the root partition and now thereâ€™s lots of free space.<br />
22. Whatâ€™s this â€œanyâ€ key Iâ€™m supposed to press?<br />
23. Do you smell something?<br />
24. Whatâ€™s that grinding sound?<br />
25. I have never seen it do *that* beforeâ€¦<br />
26. I think it should not be doing thatâ€¦<br />
27. I remember the last time I saw it do thatâ€¦<br />
28. You might as well all go home early today â€¦<br />
29. My leave starts tomorrow.<br />
30. Ooops.<br />
31. Hmm, maybe if I do thisâ€¦<br />
32. â€œWhy is my â€œrm *.oâ€ taking so long?â€<br />
33. Hmmm, curiousâ€¦<br />
34. Well, my files were backed up.<br />
35. What do you mean you needed that directory?<br />
36. What do you mean /home was on that disk? I umounted it!<br />
37. Do you really need your home directory to do any work?<br />
38. Oracle will be down until 8pm, but you can come back in and finish your work when it comes up tonight.<br />
39. I didnâ€™t think anybody would be doing any work at 2am, so I killed your job.<br />
40. Yes, I chowned all the files to belong to pvcs. Is that a problem to you?<br />
41. Weâ€™re standardizing on AIX.<br />
42. Wonder what this command does?<br />
43. What did you say your (l)user name wasâ€¦? <img alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" src="http://independentsources.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" /><br />
44. You did what to the floppy???<br />
45. Sorry, we deleted that package last weekâ€¦<br />
46. NO! Not that button!<br />
47. Uh huhâ€¦â€¦â€nu -k $USERâ€.. no problemâ€¦.sure thingâ€¦<br />
48. Sorry, we deleted that package last weekâ€¦<br />
49. [looks at workstation] â€œSay, what version of DOS is this running?â€<br />
50. Oops! (said in a quiet, almost surprised voice)<br />
51. YEEEHA!!! What a CRASH!!!<br />
52. What do you mean that could take down the whole network?<br />
53. Whatâ€™s this switch for anywaysâ€¦?<br />
54. Tell me again what that â€˜-râ€™ option to rm does<br />
55. Say, What does â€œSuperblock Errorâ€ mean, anyhow?<br />
56. If I knew it wasnâ€™t going to work, I would have tested it sooner.<br />
57. Was that your directory?<br />
58. System coming down in 0 minâ€¦.<br />
59. The backup procedure works fine, but the restore is tricky!<br />
60. Hey Fred, did you save that posting about restoring filesystems with vi and a toothpick? More importantly, did you print it out?<br />
61. OH, SH*T! (as they scrabble at the keyboard for ^c).<br />
62. The sprinkler system isnâ€™t supposed to leak is it?<br />
63. It is only a minor upgrade, the system should be back up in a few hours. (This is said on a monday afternoon.)<br />
64. I think we can plug just one more thing in to this outlet strip with out triping the breaker.<br />
65. What is all this I here about static charges destroying computers?<br />
66. I found this rabbit program that is supposed to test system performance and I have it running now.<br />
67. Ummmâ€¦ Didnâ€™t you say you turned it off?<br />
68. The networkâ€™s down, but weâ€™re working on it. Come back after diner. (Usually said at 2200 the night before thesis deadlineâ€¦)<br />
69. Ooops. Save your work, everyone. FAST!<br />
70. Boy, itâ€™s a lot easier when you know what youâ€™re doing.<br />
71. I hate it when that happens.<br />
72. And what does it mean â€˜rm: .o: No such file or directoryâ€™?<br />
73. Why did it say â€˜/bin/rm: not foundâ€™?<br />
74. Nobody was using that file /vmunix, were they?<br />
75. You can do this patch with the system upâ€¦<br />
76. What happens to a Hard Disk when you drop it?<br />
77. The only copy of Norton Utilities was on THAT disk???<br />
78. Well, Iâ€™ve got a backup, but the only copy of the restore program was on THAT diskâ€¦.<br />
79. What do mean by â€œfiredâ€?<br />
80. hey, what does mkfs do?<br />
81. where did you say those backup tapes were kept?<br />
82. â€¦and if we just swap these two disc controllers like thisâ€¦<br />
83. donâ€™t do that, itâ€™ll crash the sysâ€¦â€¦.. SHIT<br />
84. whatâ€™s this hash prompt on my terminal mean?<br />
85. dd if=/dev/null of=/vmunix<br />
86. find /usr2 -name nethack -exec rm -f {};<br />
87. now itâ€™s funny you should ask that, because I donâ€™t know either<br />
88. Any more trouble from you and your account gets moved to the 750<br />
89. Ooohh, lovely, it runs SVR4<br />
90. SMIT makes it all so much easierâ€¦â€¦<br />
91. Can you get VMS for this Sparc thingy?<br />
92. I donâ€™t care what he says, Iâ€™m not having it on my network<br />
93. We donâ€™t support that. We wonâ€™t support that.<br />
94. â€¦and after I patched the microcodeâ€¦<br />
95. Youâ€™ve got TECO. What more do you want?<br />
96. We prefer not to change the root password, itâ€™s an nice easy one<br />
97. Just add yourself to the password file and make a directoryâ€¦<br />
98-100 are being restored off of the back-up drive and will be available shorty. (Trust us, theyâ€™re funny.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/08/things-you-dont-want-to-hear-your-sysadmin-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online JavaScript Password Generator</title>
		<link>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/02/online-javascript-password-generator/</link>
		<comments>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/02/online-javascript-password-generator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frankdzedzy.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/02/online-javascript-password-generator/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have finally created a JavaScript version of my C# password generator.  The javascript version located here will generate multiple random passwords containing upper and lower case letters, numbers, and symbols.  Just hit the generate button to get your passwords.  Remember your passwords and keep them in a safe place.
I have several [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have finally created a JavaScript version of my <a href="http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/07/02/c-password-generator/">C# password generator</a>.  The javascript <a href="http://frankdzedzy.com/tools/pwgen.html">version located here</a> will generate multiple random passwords containing upper and lower case letters, numbers, and symbols.  Just hit the generate button to get your passwords.  Remember your passwords and keep them in a safe place.</p>
<p>I have several ideas to extend the functionality of <a href="http://frankdzedzy.com/tools/pwgen.html">this tool</a>, and I will work on them when I get time over the next few months.  If you have any suggestions please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/02/online-javascript-password-generator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to 32-bit</title>
		<link>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/01/back-to-32-bit/</link>
		<comments>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/01/back-to-32-bit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 04:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/01/back-to-32-bit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well tonight I reinstalled Windows XP on my computer.  However I put the 32-bit version on instead of 64-bit which I had on before.  I was having too many driver problems, and found I didn&#8217;t get any benefits from x64.
The install went smoothly, however I found out that Windows XP before sp1 does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well tonight I reinstalled Windows XP on <a href="http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/04/16/my-new-computer-setup/">my computer</a>.  However I put the 32-bit version on instead of 64-bit which I had on before.  I was having too many driver problems, and found I didn&#8217;t get any benefits from x64.</p>
<p>The install went smoothly, however I found out that Windows XP before sp1 does not support hard drives more than 130gb.  But once I installed sp2, it recognized the rest of the hard drive.  I just had to use Partition Magic to  combine the partitions.</p>
<p>I would have liked to kept Windows XP x64, but it still has too many driver problems and program incompatibilities to be viable for a typical desktop setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/08/01/back-to-32-bit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Create IIS6 Web Sites and Virtual Directories from the Command Line</title>
		<link>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/07/18/create-iis6-web-sites-and-virtual-directories-from-the-command-line/</link>
		<comments>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/07/18/create-iis6-web-sites-and-virtual-directories-from-the-command-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/07/18/create-iis6-web-sites-and-virtual-directories-from-the-command-line/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While building a new web server today I decided to see if there was a way to create Virtual Directories in IIS 6 from the command line.  I had a bunch to create and wanted to script the creation for the next time I build a web server.  I came across two vbscripts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While building a new web server today I decided to see if there was a way to create Virtual Directories in IIS 6 from the command line.  I had a bunch to create and wanted to script the creation for the next time I build a web server.  I came across two vbscripts that are installed into c:\windows\system32 with IIS.  <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;816568">This is the  Microsoft article</a> for the scripts.<span id="more-48"></span></p>
<p>IISWeb can be used to create, delete, start, stop, pause, and query websites.  Just enter >iisweb /create c:\sitefolder &#8220;My Site&#8221; to create a site.  There are also options to add ip address(/i <em>ipaddress</em>), host header(/d <em>header</em>), port (/b <em>port</em>), and options to set up a website on a remote computer.  Just use /delete to delete the site.</p>
<p>IISvdir is the script to create and delete virtual directories.  iisvdir /create &#8220;My Site&#8221; &#8220;Virtual Dir&#8221; c:\sitefolder\vdir will create a virtual directory named Virtual Dir in the web site My Site.  Note that the website comes before the virtual directory name.</p>
<p>Unfortunatly I didn&#8217;t find any config options to setup other options in the site, but just these two in some scripts are going to save me tons of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/07/18/create-iis6-web-sites-and-virtual-directories-from-the-command-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Aquires Sysinternals</title>
		<link>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/07/18/microsoft-aquires-sysinternals/</link>
		<comments>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/07/18/microsoft-aquires-sysinternals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/07/18/microsoft-aquires-sysinternals/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Winternals Software announced today that they have been  bought by Microsoft.  They were bought so that Microsoft could hire the two founders of the company, Mark Russinovich and Bryce Cogswell.  These two guys are talented Windows programmers who should add a lot to the Windows development team.  They are well known [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winternals Software <a href="http://www.winternals.com/Company/PressRelease92.aspx">announced today</a> that they have been  <a href="http://news.com.com/Microsoft+buys+Windows+utility+software+maker/2100-1016_3-6095376.html">bought by Microsoft</a>.  They were bought so that Microsoft could hire the two founders of the company, Mark Russinovich and Bryce Cogswell.  These two guys are talented Windows programmers who should add a lot to the Windows development team.  They are well known for <a href="http://www.sysinternals.com/">Sysinternals</a>, the system tools that are extremely helpful in troubleshooting windows.  Microsoft is also aquiring all these tools in the deal.  I think that this is an excellent move by Microsoft.  They get two excellent developers, and all the great support tools.  I know Microsoft likes to use the Sysinternals tools, because every time I am on a support call with them they have me download and use one of the tools.  It would be great if Microsoft could bundle these tools into Windows, or the windows support tools pack.  This would make it much easier to use these tools.</p>
<p>However part of the reason that the Sysinternals tools were so great were because they were third party tools.  Now that they are owned by Microsoft, more people will be more distrustful of the tools.  But I think that it is a good move overall.  Perhaps some other developers in Microsoft will be able to add helpful features to the tools.  I definitly do not think that Microsoft will charge for these tools, since there support department uses them so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankdzedzy.com/2006/07/18/microsoft-aquires-sysinternals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
